DSpace JSPUI


DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.insp.mx:8080/jspui/handle/20.500.12096/6854
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.coverage.spatialInternacional
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-09T16:07:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-09T16:07:21Z-
dc.date.created2017-08-16T01:48:39Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.otherhttp://doi.org/DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-13-30
dc.identifier.urisiid.insp.mx:1001-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.insp.mx:8080/jspui/handle/20.500.12096/6854-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Immunization is one of the most effective ways of preventing illness, disability death from infectious diseases for older people. However, worldwide immunization rates are still low, particularly for the most vulnerable groups within the elderly population. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of the Oportunidades an incentive based poverty alleviation program on vaccination coverage for poor rural older people in Mexico. Methods: Cross sectional study, based on 2007 Oportunidades Evaluation Survey, conducted in low income households from 741 rural communities (localities with <2,500 inhabitants) of 13 Mexican states. Vaccination coverage was defined according to three individual vaccines: tetanus, influenza pneumococcal, for complete vaccination schedule. Propensity score matching linear probability model were used in order to estimate the Oportunidades effect. Results: 12,146 older people were interviewed, 7% presented cognitive impairment. Among remaining, 4,628 were matched. Low coverage rates were observed for the vaccines analyzed. For Oportunidades non Oportunidades populations were 46% 41% for influenza, 52% 45% for pneumococcal disease, 79% 71% for tetanus, respectively. Oportunidades effect was significant in increasing the proportion of older people vaccinated: for complete schedule 5.5% (CI95% 2.8 8.3), for influenza 6.9% (CI95% 3.8 9.6), for pneumococcal 7.2% (CI95% 4.3 10.2), for tetanus 6.6% (CI95% 4.1 9.2). Conclusions: The results of this study extend the evidence on the effect that conditional transfer programs exert on health indicators. In particular, Oportunidades increased vaccination rates in the population of older people. There is a need to continue raising vaccination rates, however, particularly for the most vulnerable older people.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectOlder people, Vaccination coverage, Conditional cash transfer, Propensity score matching
dc.titleEffect of the conditional cash transfer program Oportunidades on vaccination coverage in older Mexican people
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.subject.ctiinfo:eu-repo/classification/cti/3
dc.creator.curpcurp/MAEB750414MNENST00;BETTY SOLEDAD MANRIQUE ESPINOZA
dc.creator.orcidorcid/0000-0001-5645-814X;Aaron Salinas
Appears in Collections:Artículos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
httpswwwncbinlmnihgovpmcarticlespmc37117381472-698x-13-30.pdf318.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.